Kuttlewascher. Jan
Page 1 of 1•
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by kat on Tue 18 Mar 2008, 5:51 pm
why is he standing in the south when he lives in the north?
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by kat on Thu 20 Mar 2008, 10:41 pm
agter reading his manifesto i have changed my mind ..so it is now a no from me
Replies to posts
by kuttelwascher on Fri 28 Mar 2008, 9:31 am
My manifesto is available on www.jankuttelwascher.blogspot.com.
My reasons for standing in The South are available 0n www.whyguernsey.com
Kat, I can't win them all but I hope to win enough!
My reasons for standing in The South are available 0n www.whyguernsey.com
Kat, I can't win them all but I hope to win enough!
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by GD on Fri 28 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Would you vote to save St Sampsons & St Andrews Junior Schools if not why not?
The One and Only....
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by Digger on Fri 28 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
Jan with the new school coming on line soon do you think the access is
sufficient if not what are your thoughts on this? And what could be
done to make things safer ? do you think gaining access from the rear
of the site (via green lanes) is appropriate ?
Your thoughts ?
sufficient if not what are your thoughts on this? And what could be
done to make things safer ? do you think gaining access from the rear
of the site (via green lanes) is appropriate ?
Your thoughts ?
The most successful people are those who are good at plan B. 
Reply to Posts
by kuttelwascher on Mon 31 Mar 2008, 3:23 pm
St. Andrews and St. Sampsons primary schools.
The possible closing of these schools is, at the moment, nothing more than an option. It is up for discussion. It may get no further. My advice to the PTAs of both schools is that they should try to suggest an alternative budget to education. Budgets are limited and education have a problem. St. Andrews school and its church are the heart of the parish, whereas St. Sampsons is not. In my parish, there are many parents who feel short-changed, as much more is spent , per head, in the two schools then on schools in St. Peter Port. At the end of the day, education needs to be standardised across the island. We do have a post code lottery as regards desireable schools. A solution that is fair to all children is required. It is not a simple issue.
The possible closing of these schools is, at the moment, nothing more than an option. It is up for discussion. It may get no further. My advice to the PTAs of both schools is that they should try to suggest an alternative budget to education. Budgets are limited and education have a problem. St. Andrews school and its church are the heart of the parish, whereas St. Sampsons is not. In my parish, there are many parents who feel short-changed, as much more is spent , per head, in the two schools then on schools in St. Peter Port. At the end of the day, education needs to be standardised across the island. We do have a post code lottery as regards desireable schools. A solution that is fair to all children is required. It is not a simple issue.
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by snails on Thu 03 Apr 2008, 10:58 am
This guys name alone gets my vote.
Go Kuttlewascher!
Go Kuttlewascher!
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by kuttelwascher on Thu 03 Apr 2008, 5:17 pm
Thanks for that. I could write a book on the nicknames that I have had. I was born in the Czech Republic but went to England at the age of 2. Here is a joke for you as you are a person with some humour.
To stay in good health every young lady should have a check-up at least once a year.
To stay in good health every young lady should have a check-up at least once a year.
Re: Kuttlewascher. Jan
by kuttelwascher on Thu 03 Apr 2008, 5:23 pm
To Digger.
Safe access to the school is essential. The non joined up Environment Dept. is now playing catch up. The safety of the kids is paramount and the safest option must be pursued quickly.
Safe access to the school is essential. The non joined up Environment Dept. is now playing catch up. The safety of the kids is paramount and the safest option must be pursued quickly.